Media Relations Strategies of Philanthropic Foundations: A Longitudinal Analysis of News Releases Produced by Top U.S. Foundations

Foundations are integral to the health and sustainability of the nonprofit sector. Each year, approximately 260,000 granting organizations in 39 countries provide the equivalent of $150 billion to nonprofits working to advance the public good by addressing one or more social issues (Johnson, 2018). In recent years, the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, heightened unrest over racial injustice, and increased awareness of climate change have led to shifts in foundation giving (Allen et al., 2021;di Mento, 2020) and the strategies grantmakers employ to impact systemic social change. The Council on Foundations challenged granting organizations to assist nonprofits in managing the economic impact of the pandemic (Allen et al., 2021). More than 800 foundations reduced or eliminated grant restrictions and/or simplified the application process for grantees by eliminating burdensome demands for information (Allen et al., 2021;Auger, 2014). Other significant recent changes to traditional philanthropic practice include MacKenzie Scott's bold new vision of the philanthropic process and Jack Dorsey's 100% transparent grantmaking process (Alexander & Steverman, 2021). Scott's approach provides billions of unsolicited dollars to organizations selected by her team without the constraints of standard grantmaking (Falik, 2021). The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, while more traditional in its funding, has been revolutionary in the extent of gifts to its targeted issues — mainly health care and education © 2022 Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy at Grand Valley State University. The Foundation Review is reproduced electronically by ScholarWorks@GVSU. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/tfr

Impact of an integrated care model for older persons: Evaluating a pilot programme

Background: In September 2019 Sláintecare helped establish an Integrated Care team for Older People. The aim of this service was to provide a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to older people within a community network. Service user experience/feedback are critically important for development of a team and a service. To give service users a platform to evaluate the service a patient experience survey was conducted. Methods: The survey was designed by the multidisciplinary team, consisting of 13 closed/3 open questions. A Likert scale was utilised for closed questions and thematic analysis for open questions. A question on impact of COVID-19 was also included. 150 of the 950 service users who received a CGA from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected randomly and invited to participate in the postal survey. All participants received a covering letter, questionnaire and a stamped address envelope to return their completed surveys. Results: 47% response rate (71/150). 77% were aged ≥75. 52% completed the survey themselves, 48% required assistance. 61% attendedmore than twice and most would prefer to attend a local spoke clinic. 96% agreed/strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the service. 99% felt they were treated with dignity/respect and had confidence in the service. 93% agreed that they were involved in care decisions. 82% reported their carers had the opportunity to discuss concerns. Themes emerging included importance of care close to home, avoiding acute hospital, difficulty parking at tertiary centres. 42% highlighted isolation and loneliness due to COVID-19 as a major issue. Conclusion: Service users had an overwhelmingly positive experience especially when care was delivered in clinics close to their homes. Development of the hub and spoke model is acceptable and feasible to older people and their carers' in this region and will be the focus for expansion of this service.

Low 30-day mortality in South African orthopaedic patients undergoing surgery at an academic hospital during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: It was safe to perform orthopaedic procedures at our hospital during the first COVID-19 peak.

BACKGROUND:  Initial local and global evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2-infected patients who undergo surgery, and those who become infected perioperatively, have an increased mortality risk post surgery. OBJECTIVES: To analyse and describe the 30-day mortality, presurgical COVID-19 status and hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection rates of patients, both SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative, undergoing orthopaedic surgery at a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa (SA) during the first COVID-19 peak. METHODS: This single-centre, observational, prospective study included patients who underwent orthopaedic procedures from 1 April 2020 (beginning of the COVID-19 case increase in SA) to 31 July 2020 (first COVID-19 peak in SA). All patients were screened for COVID-19 and were confirmed positive if they had a positive laboratory quantitative polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA on a nasopharyngeal or oral swab. Thirty-day mortality, presurgical COVID-19 status and hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection were assessed. RESULTS:  Overall, a total of 433 operations were performed on 346 patients during the timeframe. Of these patients, 65.9% (n=228) were male and 34.1% (n=118) were female. The mean (standard deviation) age was 42.5 (16.8) years (range 9 - 89). Of the patients, 5 (1.4%) were identified as COVID-19 patients under investigation (PUI) on admission and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before surgery, and 1 (0.3%) contracted SARS-CoV-2 perioperatively; all survived 30 days post surgery. Twenty-nine patients were lost to follow-up, and data were missing for 6 patients. The final analysis was performed excluding these 35 patients. Of the 311 patients included in the final 30-day mortality analysis, 303 (97%) had a follow-up observation ≥30 days after the operation. The overall 30-day mortality for these patients was 2.5% (n=8 deaths). None of the recorded deaths were of screened COVID-19 PUI. CONCLUSIONS: We report a low 30-day mortality rate of 2.5% (n=8) for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery at our hospital during the first COVID-19 peak. None of the deaths were COVID-19 related, and all patients who tested SARS-CoV-2-positive, before or after surgery, survived. Our overall 30-day mortality rate correlates with several other reports of orthopaedic centres analysing over similar timeframes during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Regarding mortality and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk, we can conclude that with the appropriate measures taken, it was safe to undergo orthopaedic procedures at our hospital during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in SA.

Drastic reduction of orthopaedic services at an urban tertiary hospital in South Africa during COVID-19: Lessons for the future response to the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted on the global surgery landscape. OBJECTIVES: To analyse and describe the initial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic surgery at Groote Schuur Hospital, a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa. METHODS: The number of orthopaedic surgical cases, emergency theatre patient waiting times, and numbers of outpatient clinic visits, ward admissions, bed occupancies and total inpatient days for January - April 2019 (pre-COVID-19) were compared with the same time frame in 2020 (COVID-19). The COVID-19 timeframe included initiation of a national 'hard lockdown' from 26 March 2020, in preparation for an increasing volume of COVID-19 cases. RESULTS: April 2020, the time of the imposed hard lockdown, was the most affected month, although the number of surgical cases had started to decrease slowly during the 3 preceding months. The total number of surgeries, outpatient visits and ward admissions decreased significantly during April 2020 (55.2%, 69.1% and 60.6%, respectively) compared with April 2019 (p<0.05). Trauma cases were reduced by 40% in April 2020. Overall emergency theatre patient waiting time was 30% lower for April 2020 compared with 2019. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 and the associated lockdown has heavily impacted on both orthopaedic inpatient and outpatient services. Lockdown led to a larger reduction in the orthopaedic trauma burden than in international centres, but the overall reduction in surgeries, outpatient visits and hospital admissions was less. This lesser reduction was probably due to local factors, but also to a conscious decision to avoid total collapse of our surgical services.